Strong Feet Athletics Leviathan Shoes

I wanted to give a quick overview of my experience with the Leviathan shoes. I really wanted to like these, as I wear Altra (zero-drop) shoes pretty much everywhere I go on foot. The Leviathan has a similar forefoot shape and zero drop, so was hoping I could have the same on the bike!

Firstly, they are soooo heavy! If everything else was great, I was prepared to deal with it; I don’t race anymore. My current shoes (Shimano RC7) are 302 g with cleats (each). The Leviathan were 411 g each, no cleats.

But the biggest problem was heel slip. I ordered my normal size (43), which Strong Feet agreed via email was the right size based on my foot dimensions. But there was so much heel slip, there was no way I was going to install the cleats. I ended up swapping out for a 42, which felt ok size-wise. Perhaps a little snug, and certainly wouldn’t have worked with winter socks…but unfortunately I had identical heel slip. Again, I wasn’t willing to install cleats (as then I couldn’t return), so I never rode these shoes. But all other cycling shoes I have (various brands) have no heel slip, on or off the bike. I can’t imagine how unusable the Leviathans would have been when riding with anything but the lightest effort.

I sure hope others have had success with these, as the owner seemed to indicate this heel slip is not a normal problem with his customers. I’m fine with it just being me :slight_smile:

(Also, YMMV – the website says you can exchange sizes for free, but I was charged. Annoying, but not something for which I chose to put up a fight.)



So…who’s got some good shoes to recommend for wide feet?! :grin:

Bont Cycling. More “foot-shaped”, but not quite as pronounced as Altras. Not zero drop but once you’re clipped in it doesn’t really matter. They’re a little pricy but I love mine. I’ve had zero issues with heel lift, discomfort, durability, etc. Others have said they are unimpressed with the carbon fiber “bathtub” construction of the bottom of the shoe, but I don’t mind.

2 Likes

The biomechanics of cycling is different to walking. There isn’t as much forefoot splay in cycling, which barefoot walking and running shoes enable. Reestablishing proprioception in the cycling shoe is important for an optimal pedal stroke and usually achieved through foot correction and wedging; I can’t see barefoot design contributing to this in cycling.

Also, I don’t get the point about zero drop reducing dorsiflexion. Doesn’t a shoe with drop increase plantar flexion?

Here’s an article all about that. (I just wanted to share my experience with the actual product, for those who may be considering a purchase.)

Lake. Standard fit is wide enough for most folks, and they have a wide fit as well. I can’t overstate how much I love my Lake shoes.

1 Like

Another vote for Bont, the Vaypor 23/SL are wider than the Vaypor S and more forgiving because the carbon bathtub design isn’t as high on the sides

Bont width goes Vaypor S>Vaypor 23> Vaypor S Wide> Vaypor 23 W> Vaypor S double wide

Seems confusing but then if you look at the Lake shoe catalogue it’s relatively simple

1 Like