I’ve started thinking about doing an everesting and I’ve identified two climbs that could work potentially. One is a completely separated from traffic, it’s wide, tarmac is perfect - but it’s right next to a fairly large road (2x2 lanes). The other option is in the middle of nowhere, very little traffic but it’s got pretty bad surface and I could definitely wouldn’t been able to descend as fast as on the other road.
I am inclided to use the first road but I was wondering if the proximity to a busy, major road (and thus breathing in all sorts of nasties for 15-16 hours (I’m not fast) might not be the best idea.
Any input from the hive mind?
I would go ride each one for an hour or so and see how they feel and how much elevation you get done. That would be a good thing anyway for pacing and other logistics.
There is a really good ride in Santa Barbara that is actually right on the freeway. It does seem hard to believe.
3 Likes
I back Clint’s suggestion. Always good to log a bit of time on each of your climb options. There are always things you’ll discover that you love or hate about them. I’m always trying to think “can I see myself riding this for 10 hours” and the answer is sometimes yes, but sometimes no!
1 Like
As Andy and Clint have said, with the added consideration of “will I feel safe in the middle of the night and being super fatigued?” (if riding at night)
1 Like
That sounds like a great idea, thanks!
Good point, might opt for the traffic-free option!
I assume this is THE Balint Hamvas, photographer extraordinaire and creator of the fantastic Cyclocross annuals and VeIofocus Road Books (of which we have several)? 
I’d choose good tarmac over good air as when I’m 12 hours in and riding by artificial light I wouldn’t want to be trying to rely on my concentration to avoid potholes.
1 Like
Hah, it is indeed me, thanks for your kind words and the solid advice!
1 Like